Showing posts with label semiotics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label semiotics. Show all posts

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Day 28: An Ecclectic Mix of New Learning

  • Today I feel like a child in a candy store. Well, literally and figuratively. Yes, I over-consumed (again) on the sweets and chocolate. But, I'll continue to use stress as my convenient excuse for the time being!





  • It was written in a pleasant-to-read, natural way. It is as if he were standing in front of you, telling the stories of his experience. His approach to effective quali research really rang a bell: he bases it on our sensory awareness! This is exactly what I have been doing while I was working in advertising! More importantly, what the book says is exactly what I have been telling people what vipassana or mindfulness meditation is all about!

  • This means I've been on the right track all along! Cool! This book gives me more confidence! Moreover, I was pleasantly surprised to find it discusses, among others, semiotics as well. It was grouped together with Grounded Theory and Phenomenology under the Chapter on "Interpreting" your qualitative research.

  • The book began with teaching the observing and listening skills, both skills required in a good quali researcher. The more I look back, the more I see the similarities between vipassana meditation and quali research!

  • In essence, Lord Buddha has shown the world how to conduct an effective qualitative research: observing without judgement! He did it so well, observing what goes on with his own body and mind until he got Enlightenment!

  • If we only apply this same mechanism to whatever we observe, we would then be likely to get Enlightened, too, so to speak! But first, we must build the "Baramee" or the charisma and all the charactertistics fit for a Buddha first! The first thing that came to my mind is "Kanti Baramee!" A good researcher needs to be patient, believe me! That's the thing you'll need the most!

  • And while performing some search on the net today, I came across several terms relating to semiotics that I would also like to pursue also as a reference to my Literature Review Chapter of my dissertation. And that is about Morphology, Lexicon, and Philology.

  • First, I must say that I want to use these approach to explain my discovery about the word "Nen" in Japanese. I won't divulge in details here. But let's just say I plan to explain it in light of the following studies.

Morphology (linguistics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lexical morphology

Lexical morphology is the branch of morphology that deals with the lexicon, which, morphologically conceived, is the collection of lexemes in a language. As such, it concerns itself primarily with word-formation: derivation and compounding.

---------------------------------
Etymology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymology
Note created May 3, 2007

Etymology is the study of the history of words - when they entered a language, from what source, and how their form and meaning have changed over time.

In languages with a long written history, etymology makes use of philology, the study of how words change from culture to culture over time. However, etymologists also apply the methods of comparative linguistics to reconstruct information about languages that are too old for any direct information (such as writing) to be known. By analyzing related languages with a technique known as the comparative method, linguists can make inferences about their shared parent language and its vocabulary.



  • Basically, this is it for today. I'm going to read the rest of the chapter of that book by Professor Gary Shank now. Good night! :-)


Saturday, April 28, 2007

Days 21-23: Importance of Issue, Objectives

My grandma passed away on April 25, 2007. Therefore, Days 21-23 have been pretty hectic for me.

Nevertheless, I managed to bring along a book to read whenever I could and made some progress, although I didn't blog about it.

Most of what I have been reading these past few days was on semiotics. I found this very helpful in trying to help me with my introduction chapter. I rewrote (again!), part of the intro and also made some changes in my objectives.

I plan to get the mindmap look right before I delve into the details in actual writing than just bolstering ahead wildly like I did last time. I told myself I already have most of the materials I need for the intro chapter anyway. The most important thing is I need to get my foundation right.

Because if my research questions or my objectives are not clear, that would result in a lot of wasted time ahead down the road. So I keep tell myself to be patient.

Here is the latest revised version of my mindmaps. It has grown bigger from the previous version, so I have to split the map again.



(Click to see bigger map)

proposal 3





Objectives April 26