Day 10: Methodology Reloaded
Well, I feel so embarrassed to say that I totally forgot what I studied two years ago in Philosophy of Science course! Well, not exactly all of them. But to make sure I make an accurate next step and stay on the right course, I did look up my trusted online source for all things philosophical--the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy--. This is after a visit to Wiki made me more confused than before!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenomenology and Ontology, Epistemology, Logic, Ethics
The discipline of phenomenology forms one basic field in philosophy among others. How is phenomenology distinguished from, and related to, other fields in philosophy?
Traditionally, philosophy includes at least four core fields or disciplines: ontology, epistemology, ethics, logic. Suppose phenomenology joins that list. Consider then these elementary definitions of field:
- Ontology is the study of beings or their being — what is.
- Epistemology is the study of knowledge — how we know.
- Logic is the study of valid reasoning — how to reason.
- Ethics is the study of right and wrong — how we should act.
- Phenomenology is the study of our experience — how we experience.
The domains of study in these five fields are clearly different, and they seem to call for different methods of study.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, my friend kindly suggested I should use a phenomenological approach in my dissertation. I would certainly bring this up to my advisor this time. I hope this would not sound too metaphysical for my sociological degree over here!
Oh, sociological is such a difficult field to tackle! It is supposed to be scientific, yet is is very abstract. And all I want to do is a simple thesis to tell the world that mindfulness is indeed a good thing not only to yourself but to the community you live in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHENOMENOLOGY
Myron Orleans
Encyclopedia of Sociology
Phenomenology is a movement in philosophy that has been adapted by certain sociologists to promote an understanding of the relationship between states of individual consciousness and social life. As an approach within sociology, phenomenology seeks to reveal how human awareness is implicated in the production of social action, social situations and social worlds (Natanson 1970).
Phenomenology was initially developed by Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), a German mathematician who felt that the objectivism of science precluded an adequate apprehension of the world (Husserl 1931, 1970). He presented various philosophical conceptualizations and techniques designed to locate the sources or essences of reality in the human consciousness. It was not until Alfred Schutz (1899-1959) came upon some problems in Max Weber's theory of action that phenomenology entered the domain of sociology (Schutz 1967). Schutz distilled from Husserl's rather dense writings a sociologically relevant approach. Schutz set about describing how subjective meanings give rise to an apparently objective social world (Schutz, 1962, 1964, 1966, 1970. 1996; Schutz and Luckmann 1973; Wagner 1983).
Schutz's migration to the United States prior to World War II, along with that of other phenomenologically inclined scholars, resulted in the transmission of this approach to American academic circles and to its ultimate transformation into interpretive sociology. Two expressions of this approach have been called reality constructionism and ethnomethodology. Reality constructionism synthesizes Schutz's distillation of phenomenology and the corpus of classical sociological thought to account for the possibility of social reality (Berger 1963, 1967; Berger and Berger 1972; Berger and Kellner 1981; Berger and Luckmann 1966; Potter 1996). Ethnomethodology integrates the Parsonian concern for social order into phenomenology and examines the means by which actors make ordinary life possible (Garfinkel 1967; Garfinkel and Sacks 1970). Reality constructionism and ethnomethodology are recognized to be among the most fertile orientations in the field of sociology (Ritzer 1996).
Phenomenology is used in two basic ways in sociology: (1) to theorize about substantive sociological problems and (2) to enhance the adequacy of sociological research methods. Since phenomenology insists that society is a human construction, sociology itself and its theories and methods are also constructions (Cicourel 1964; 1973). Thus, phenomenology seeks to offer a corrective to the field's emphasis on positivist conceptualizations and research methods that may take for granted the very issues that phenomenologists find of interest. Phenomenology presents theoretical techniques and qualitative methods that illuminate the human meanings of social life.
Phenomenology has until recently been viewed as at most a challenger of the more conventional styles of sociological work and at the least an irritant. Increasingly, phenomenology is coming to be viewed as an adjunctive or even integral part of the discipline, contributing useful analytic tools to balance objectivist approaches (Aho 1998; Levesque-Lopman 1988; Luckmann 1978; Psathas 1973; Rogers 1983).
2 comments:
Try my textbook bang na.
Excerpts only na ka:
Phenomenological study describes the meaning for serveral individuals of their lived experience of a concept or a phenomenon.
(Yours = being transformed by mindfulness)
Phenomenologists focus on describinh what all participants have in common as they experience that phenomenon. (for example, grief is universally experienced)
The basic purpose of phenomenology is to reduce individual experiences with a phenomenon to a description of the universal essence (a "grasp" of the very nature of the thing")
First step is to identify an object of human experience, a phenomenon such as insomnia, being left out, undergoing a surgery and coping with it, etc.
--------
the outcome of your research = description of essence of those experience (i.e. being transformed).
--------
This description consists of "what" they experience and "how" they experience it
Data are collected from the individual who have experienced this transformation by means of in-depth interviews; observation; or document content analysis of journal entries, arts, poetry, or even music.
2 main questions for interview or to ask participants to write in their journal or to ask yourself when analyse document include:
1. what have you experience?
2. what context or situations have typically influenced or affected your experiences of this transformation?
For data analysis, it's quite a pain if you do interviews...you may hire transcribers to transcribe the interview for you and then you analyse the texts. The difficult part is you need to take some courses on how to do qualitative research...how to analyse these data using "coding" and "thematic analysis".
UNLESS...your school allows you to hand in non-print dissertation and just make a documentary film out of all this!!!! (I so wanna do this had I knew it could be done here in Canada!)
That's all for now ka : )
oh! the text I referred to us by
John W. Creswell. "Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design" Choosing Along Five Approaches" (2nd edition) Sage Publication. 2007.
I am actually no expert on phenomenology na ka. I use Ethnography which hold quite a different ontological/epistemic postition ka.
But I do think your topic fits more with Phenomenology because "being transformed" is a "lived experience" jing jing.
Wow, your textbook is so user-friendly! hee hee
No, I know you are so kind to help digest it for me.
Your analysis has actually made me, for the first time, feel excited about phenomenological approach! Gee, you are really gifted in explaining a difficult concept. Your future students are indeed blessed. I feel happy for Thailand for this! :-)
Tomorrow I would integrate this part about phenomenological approach in my proposal to my advisor ja. And we'll all keep my fingers across and we'll see....
Post a Comment