Monday, April 16, 2007

Day 11: Phenomenological Sociology

Didn't make much progress today. My illness confined me to bed most of the afternoon again. I must ask my doc in next visit if this is the result of my sleep apnea, allergy, hypoxia, hypothyroid, or all of the above. :-p It's not fun living with all those symptoms and more when you try to do a dissertation. It's worst when they all hit you at the same time when you think you just had it going for the first time in 3 long years!

Well, complaints aside, I had a good day because I managed to get another great tip from my friend! This time, in a form of clear explanation of the phenomenological approach that I could perhaps use in my dissertation! It got me excited for the first time! The light at the end of the tunnel seems to be bigger by the day!

However, like in Buddhism's teaching, my joy did not last long. After I checked my Encyclopedia of Sociology, I discovered that Phenomenology is a bad boy of Sociology! Would I ever get away from this curse? Just look at this excerpt:

Phenomenological sociology has not greatly influenced sociology as a whole and has also been subjected to extensive criticism. It has been argued that it deals with trivial topics, is purely descriptive, has had very little empirical application and neglects the notion of social structure. (Abercrombie, Hill & Turner, 2000, p. 262).

I still have to find out more about all this. But one thing that perhaps cheers me up a bit was the "See Also:" part at the bottom of the entry. Among others was the term "Verstehen," the German word for Insight or Understanding that was one of the first terms in sociology that actually thrilled me. Come to think of it, there has been almost no other sociological terms that has ever made an impression on me in a big way, although "Sociological Imagination" came pretty close.


Needless to say, I fell for the word Verstehen not because of its exotic and sexy accent, but because of its close meaning to the idea of Insight as in Insight Meditation in Buddhism which means Vipassana Meditation which is what I really want to talk about in my dissertation.


So we'll see. May be phenomenological sociology would be my answer after all, academically controversial and all that, if I get my advisor's blessings, of course.



3 comments:

Unknown said...

Another German word for you ka...
"Weltanschauung" (worldview)

If you like the sound of phenomenology but are afraid to use becuase it's called a "bad boy" (which to the positivist, it is); you have to argue that you choose this approach because of your worldview.

And because there's no other way- quantitatively- to translate the goodness of the topic into academic realm.

Yes, the product of phenomenology is descriptions. But it can also be in diagrammatic form (a model of how mindfulness transform a person into a leader).

I think to me, it's more useful than proving that there's association there statistically.

The positivists, though, will shoot you with the questions like...
1. How do you "validate" your findings?
2. How do you know it's "true"?
3. How do you make sure there's now other people who experience it differently if you don't use randomly sampling method?

So.....be prepared ka!
I humbly warn you that writing this part of your dissertation is the most painful one IF you are not clear of your ontological/epistemic stand-point.

The good thing is...there are A LOT of people doing good phenomenology who have already argue abour these questions for you.

The bad news is...you have to read lot...and there's MANY type of phenomenology...you have to choose which one fits your worldview and the topic under study.

In conclusion, to get your study done is not that difficult, but to defend the merit of it is a big task for you if your advisor or the whole department is a postivist.

That's all for today ka : )
PS. apology for all the typos na ka : P

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.